[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74D303B1-08F8-4CDF-8732-9352FFDEC463@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 17:47:13 +0000
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
CC: Zhi Li <yieli@...hat.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: make a copy of struct iattr before calling
notify_change
> On May 17, 2023, at 12:26 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> notify_change can modify the iattr structure. In particular it can can
> end up setting ATTR_MODE when ATTR_KILL_SUID is already set, causing a
> BUG() if the same iattr is passed to notify_change more than once.
>
> Make a copy of the struct iattr before calling notify_change.
>
> Fixes: 34b91dda7124 NFSD: Make nfsd4_setattr() wait before returning NFS4ERR_DELAY
> Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207969
> Reported-by: Zhi Li <yieli@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> index c4ef24c5ffd0..ad0c5cd900b1 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> @@ -538,7 +538,9 @@ nfsd_setattr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
>
> inode_lock(inode);
> for (retries = 1;;) {
> - host_err = __nfsd_setattr(dentry, iap);
> + struct iattr attrs = *iap;
This construct always makes me queazy. I'm never sure if an
initializer inside a loop is "only once" or "every time". I
fixed a bug like this once.
But if you've tested it and it addresses the BUG, then let's
go with this. I can apply it to nfsd-fixes.
> +
> + host_err = __nfsd_setattr(dentry, &attrs);
> if (host_err != -EAGAIN || !retries--)
> break;
> if (!nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode))
> --
> 2.40.1
>
--
Chuck Lever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists