linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] Bindings for the workqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZGVLo1V4kjx_lep5@slm.duckdns.org>
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2023 11:48:19 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc:     rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] Bindings for the workqueue

Hello, Alice.

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 08:31:12PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> This patchset contains bindings for the kernel workqueue.
> 
> One of the primary goals behind the design used in this patch is that we
> must support embedding the `work_struct` as a field in user-provided
> types, because this allows you to submit things to the workqueue without
> having to allocate, making the submission infallible. If we didn't have
> to support this, then the patch would be much simpler. One of the main
> things that make it complicated is that we must ensure that the function
> pointer in the `work_struct` is compatible with the struct it is
> contained within.
> 
> This patch could be significantly simplified if we already had the field
> projection bindings. However, we have decided to upstream the current
> version that does not depend on field projection first - the PR that
> introduces field projections will then include a commit that simplifies
> the workqueue implementation. (In particular, it would simplify the 5th
> patch in this series.)
> 
> The first version of the workqueue bindings was written by Wedson, but
> I have rewritten much of it so that it uses the pin-init infrastructure
> and can be used with containers other than `Arc`.

I tried to read the patches but am too dumb to understand much. Any chance
you can provide some examples so that I can at least imagine how workqueue
would be used from rust side?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun