[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202305171653.8A5393C6@keescook>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 16:54:18 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Sam James <sam@...too.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Enable -fstrict-flex-arrays=3
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:47:41AM +0100, Sam James wrote:
>
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
>
> > The -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 option is now available with the release
> > of GCC 13[1] and Clang 16[2]. This feature instructs the compiler to
> > treat only C99 flexible arrays as dynamically sized for the purposes of
> > object size calculations. In other words, the ancient practice of using
> > 1-element arrays, or the GNU extension of using 0-sized arrays, as a
> > dynamically sized array is disabled. This allows CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS,
> > CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE, and other object-size aware features to behave
> > unambiguously in the face of trailing arrays: only C99 flexible arrays
> > are considered to be dynamically sized.
> >
> > Enabling this will help track down any outstanding cases of fake
> > flexible arrays that need attention in kernel code.
> >
> > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C-Dialect-Options.html#index-fstrict-flex-arrays
> > [2] https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.html#cmdoption-clang-fstrict-flex-arrays
> >
>
> Maybe link to https://people.kernel.org/kees/bounded-flexible-arrays-in-c as well
> just in case some confused soul ends up bisecting to this but doesn't
> get the problem?
>
> Not really required though, just a thought I had.
Ah yeah, good idea! :)
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists