[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2dde6c62-bb0e-4b1e-e3d8-fe3aea4d947e@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 04:37:45 +0000
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro@...tmail.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v4 04/11] common/xfs: Limit fio size job to fit
into xfs fs
On 5/11/23 07:09, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> The usable capacity of the filesystem is less than the raw
> partition/device size due to the additional meta/log data.
>
> Ensure that the job size for fio is not exceeding the limits.
>
> Because we have hard coded the path where we mount the filesystem
> and don't want to expose this, we just update max size inside
> _xfs_run_fio_verify_io(). No need to leak this into the caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
> ---
>
make sense for the xfs fio verify, looks good.
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>
-ck
Powered by blists - more mailing lists