lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5c2af7c-2b63-f30d-f568-c136dd6f6c5c@nvidia.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2023 04:44:22 +0000
From:   Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
To:     Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>,
        Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro@...tmail.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v4 09/11] nvme{045,047}: Calculate IO size for
 random fio jobs

On 5/11/23 07:09, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> _nvme_calc_run_io_size() returns the jobs size for _run_fio_rand_io()
> function. The jobs size is the size per job, thus we have to divide
> through the number of CPUs.

sorry I didn't understand why we have to divide through number of
CPUs ? isn't tht will change the current job size of the test ?

unless we are increasing somewhere which I missed it .

-ck


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ