lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGQoRJrSvQkbFbUf@rli9-mobl>
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2023 09:05:08 +0800
From:   Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>
To:     Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
CC:     Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        "David Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Reported-by checkpatch warning from v6.4-rc1

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 11:47:45AM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
> 
> On 15/05/2023 21:17, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > Hello,
> > starting from commit d6ccdd678e45 ("checkpatch: check for misuse of the link tags")
> > any Reported-by: tag not followed by a Closes trigger a warning, even if
> > we have a Link: tag afterward.
> 
> The warning you are mentioning below is likely due to commit
> 44c31888098a ("checkpatch: allow Closes tags with links") instead I think.
> 
> This commit is linked to the modification of the documentation allowing
> the Closes tag, see commit 0d828200ad56 ("docs: process: allow Closes
> tags with links") for more details.
> 
> Initially, the intension was to allow using the Closes tags with links
> to public bugs trackers because in 6.3, checkpatch was displaying
> warnings when it was used while it was fine before. But it turned out
> that this Closes tag can be useful for bots tracking bugs reported on
> public mailing lists. As explained in [1] and [2], various bug trackers
> can use this tag to trigger some actions. It is then helpful to use the
> Closes tag each time a commit fixes a bug reported somewhere.
> 
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230314-doc-checkpatch-closes-tag-v4-0-d26d1fa66f9f@tessares.net/T/
> [2] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html
> 
> > Example:
> > 
> > WARNING: Reported-by: should be immediately followed by Closes: with a URL to the report
> > #8:
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202305152341.oiSjRpv6-lkp@intel.com/
> > total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 8 lines checked
> The warning is saying to replace the "Link:" tag by a "Closes:" one
> here. Is it an issue to do that here?
> 
> I guess it means that the kernel test robot should then suggest to use
> the "Closes:" tag. I can report an issue on their bugs tracker.

Hi Mat, thanks a lot for the suggestion, use Closes tag is clearer here,
we will update the report info accordingly.

> 
> > From what I can understand it was not in the intention of that patch,
> > and Link: is still fine to be used.
> 
> Note that Checkpatch cannot cover all cases: it gives you
> recommendations but they can be ignored (and documented in the commit
> message) if they don't make sense in your case. Here, it looks like you
> should use the Closes tag but it might be fine to use the Link tag if a
> commit doesn't fully fix the reported issue for example.
> 
> Cheers,
> Matt
> -- 
> Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
> www.tessares.net

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ