[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <424735804fa1cfabf3b1d76b4b3dd9162f4338a8.camel@maquefel.me>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 12:29:21 +0300
From: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 36/43] pwm: ep93xx: drop legacy pinctrl
Hello Uwe!
On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 08:13 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Nikita,
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 01:43:27PM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 16:32 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 03:34:52PM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-
> > > > ep93xx.c
> > > > index 8bfe6cfbb3db..657adb011aeb 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c
> > > > @@ -45,20 +45,6 @@ static inline struct ep93xx_pwm
> > > > *to_ep93xx_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> > > > return container_of(chip, struct ep93xx_pwm, chip);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static int ep93xx_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
> > > > pwm_device *pwm)
> > > > -{
> > > > - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(chip-
> > > > > dev);
> > > > -
> > > > - return ep93xx_pwm_acquire_gpio(pdev);
> > >
> > > I didn't get the whole series and didn't spot a relevant followup
> > > change
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230424123522.18302-1-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me/
>
> Yeah, I looked there, but didn't find it. Applied the whole series
> now
> and found "ARM: ep93xx: soc: drop defines". A few things I noticed
> while
> doing so:
>
> - git am warns about new blank lines at EOF in several patches.
>
> - b4 am 20230424123522.18302-1-nikita.shubin@...uefel.me
> warns about broken DKIM signatures. The copy I got directly via Cc
> is
> OK though. The relevant problem is that your To: header is empty
> but
> part of the signed payload + the copy I got via vger.kernel.org
> had
> the To header mangled to
>
> To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
>
> This results in:
>
> $ curl -s
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230424123522.18302-37-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me/raw
> | dkimverify
> signature verification failed
> $ curl -s
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230424123522.18302-37-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me/raw
> | sed 's/^To:.*/To:/' | dkimverify
> signature ok
>
> I don't know who is to blame here (i.e. is an empty To allowed?)
> but
> I'd recommend to put the people you want to merge the patches into
> the To header anyhow.
>
> > > on lore.k.o, so: I assume ep93xx_pwm_acquire_gpio() and
> > > ep93xx_pwm_release_gpio() will be unused in the end? Do you drop
> > > them?
> > >
> > > I assume this series target to be taken via arm-soc (once the
> > > review
> > > feedback is positive)?
>
> You didn't reply to that one. Still assuming this to be true, I'll
> mark
> this patch as handled-elsewhere in the PWM patchwork.
Oh sorry about that, yes the current plan is taking the whole series at
once, when acked by.
>
> > > I wonder if this change breaks non-dt machine support?
> >
> > The aim for the whole series is fully converting to dt, this means
> > platform files will be dropped.
> >
> > The v1 series tries not to break anything until platform removal
> > commit, before this commit non-dt version should be compilable and
> > fully functional.
>
> OK, the pwm patch looks fine to me,
>
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
>
> Best regards and thanks for your efforts,
> Uwe
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists