[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04428bad-4044-ef59-8dfe-381741164148@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 09:20:14 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, songmuchun@...edance.com,
mike.kravetz@...cle.com, willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: remove hugetlb_page_subpool()
On 17.05.23 00:52, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> All users of hugetlb_page_subpool() have been converted to use the folio
> equivalent. This function can be safely removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 13 -------------
> 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index b2b698f9a2ecb..21f942025fecd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -755,14 +755,6 @@ static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio
> return folio->_hugetlb_subpool;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * hugetlb page subpool pointer located in hpage[2].hugetlb_subpool
> - */
> -static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_page_subpool(struct page *hpage)
> -{
> - return hugetlb_folio_subpool(page_folio(hpage));
> -}
> -
> static inline void hugetlb_set_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio,
> struct hugepage_subpool *subpool)
> {
> @@ -1029,11 +1021,6 @@ static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_page_subpool(struct page *hpage)
> -{
> - return NULL;
> -}
> -
> static inline int isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page,
> struct list_head *list)
> {
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists