linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Input: tests: add test to cover all input_grab

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a5y39xjq.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2023 10:23:05 +0200
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To:     Dana Elfassy <delfassy@...hat.com>, eballetb@...hat.com,
        dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dana Elfassy <dangel101@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: tests: add test to cover all input_grab_device()
 function

Dana Elfassy <delfassy@...hat.com> writes:

Hello Dana,

Is great to see more input Kunit tests being added, thanks!

> Currently input_grab_device() isn't covered by any tests
> Thus, adding a test to cover the cases:
> 1. The device is grabbed successfully
> 2. Trying to grab a device that is already grabbed by another input
>    handle
>
> Signed-off-by: Dana Elfassy <dangel101@...il.com>
> ---

I tested this and it worked for me:

$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=drivers/input/tests/.kunitconfig
...
[09:36:42] Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
[09:36:42] ============================================================
[09:36:43] ================= input_core (4 subtests) ==================
[09:36:43] [PASSED] input_test_polling
[09:36:43] [PASSED] input_test_timestamp
[09:36:43] [PASSED] input_test_match_device_id
[09:36:43] [PASSED] input_test_grab
[09:36:43] =================== [PASSED] input_core ====================
[09:36:43] ============================================================
[09:36:43] Testing complete. Ran 4 tests: passed: 4
[09:36:43] Elapsed time: 129.985s total, 5.005s configuring, 124.864s building, 0.062s running

>  drivers/input/tests/input_test.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/tests/input_test.c b/drivers/input/tests/input_test.c
> index 25bbf51b5c87..cd4db365e9fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/tests/input_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/tests/input_test.c
> @@ -124,10 +124,38 @@ static void input_test_match_device_id(struct kunit *test)
>  	KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, input_match_device_id(input_dev, &id));
>  }
>  
> +
> +static void input_test_grab(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct input_dev *input_dev = test->priv;
> +	struct input_handle test_handle;
> +	struct input_handler handler;
> +	struct input_handle handle;
> +	struct input_device_id id;
> +	int res;
> +
> +	handler.name = "handler";
> +	handler.id_table = &id;
> +
> +	handle.dev = input_get_device(input_dev);
> +	handle.name = dev_name(&input_dev->dev);
> +	handle.handler = &handler;
> +	res = input_grab_device(&handle);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, input_grab_device(&handle));
> +

I think you need to add a input_put_device(input_dev) here ?

Otherwise the reference counter won't be decremented.

> +	test_handle.dev = input_get_device(input_dev);
> +	test_handle.name = dev_name(&input_dev->dev);
> +	test_handle.handler = &handler;
> +

I think you can just reuse the handle variable that was set-up before ?

There's no need to another test_handle variable as far as I can tell.

> +	res = input_grab_device(&test_handle);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, res, -EBUSY);

And here add an input_put_device(input_dev) call too.

Other than that the patch looks good to me.

Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat