linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] dt-bindings: net: nxp,sja1105: document spi-cpol/cpha

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50cc1727-999f-9b7a-ef09-14461fa4ddfb@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2023 10:26:38 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] dt-bindings: net: nxp,sja1105: document spi-cpol/cpha

On 17/05/2023 05:10, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 15 May 2023 13:50:35 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:45:25AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Some boards use SJA1105 Ethernet Switch with SPI CPHA, while ones with
>>> SJA1110 use SPI CPOL, so document this to fix dtbs_check warnings:
>>>
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-bluebox3.dtb: ethernet-switch@0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('spi-cpol' was unexpected)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> 
> Is my instinct that this should go to net-next correct?

It would be great missing net-next was pointed out by checkpatch.pl.

Best regards,
Krzysztof