[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4594ffcc-ca24-e813-1991-20221c772b46@bytedance.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 17:28:14 +0800
From: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@...edance.com>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] sched/numa: add per-process numa_balancing
Hi all,
Since both 6.4-rc1 merge window and LSFMMBPF are over, could you take
a look now?
Thanks,
Gang Li
On 2023/4/28 15:45, Gang Li wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> I'll keep an eye on the progress.
>
> On 2023/4/28 15:40, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> On 4/27/23 12:17, Gang Li wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Looks like there are no objections or comments. Do you have any ideas?
>>>
>>> Can we merge this patch in the next merge window.
>>>
>>
>> We're at 6.4 merge window, so the maintainer focus is to send PR updates
>> to Linus. And this series didn't get applied before this merge window.
>> Wait until 6.4-rc1 is out and reroll.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists