[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230517-sinner-remember-a5f6b86194ab@wendy>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 11:57:14 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
CC: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 1/2] pwm: add microchip soft ip corePWM driver
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 12:20:30PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Conor,
>
> I found one remaining issue:
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:27:09AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > +static u64 mchp_core_pwm_calc_duty(const struct pwm_state *state, u64 clk_rate,
> > + u8 prescale, u8 period_steps)
> > +{
> > + u64 duty_steps, tmp;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Calculate the duty cycle in multiples of the prescaled period:
> > + * duty_steps = duty_in_ns / step_in_ns
> > + * step_in_ns = (prescale * NSEC_PER_SEC) / clk_rate
> > + * The code below is rearranged slightly to only divide once.
> > + */
> > + tmp = (prescale + 1) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
>
> If prescale > 4 this overflows on 32bit archs, doesn't it?
Ooh, I think you are right.
> (I think prescale + 1 is promoted to unsigned int, then the
> multiplication is done and only then the range is extended to u64.
I'll respin with an explicit cast.
Thanks,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists