[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMty3ZBk-Zg-RFZv1Owo5aE9C8VpFXq45nLE-mBVSc=2o=iq4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 16:57:50 +0530
From: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
To: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, aford@...conembedded.com,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 5/6] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Dynamically configure
DPHY timing
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 5:27 AM Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The DPHY timings are currently hard coded. Since the input
> clock can be variable, the phy timings need to be variable
> too. To facilitate this, we need to cache the hs_clock
> based on what is generated from the PLL.
>
> The phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config_for_hsclk function
> configures the DPHY timings in pico-seconds, and a small macro
> converts those timings into clock cycles based on the hs_clk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
> Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
> Tested-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
> Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
> Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> index 08266303c261..3944b7cfbbdf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> @@ -218,6 +218,8 @@
>
> #define OLD_SCLK_MIPI_CLK_NAME "pll_clk"
>
> +#define PS_TO_CYCLE(ps, hz) DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(((ps) * (hz)), 1000000000000ULL)
> +
> static const char *const clk_names[5] = {
> "bus_clk",
> "sclk_mipi",
> @@ -651,6 +653,8 @@ static unsigned long samsung_dsim_set_pll(struct samsung_dsim *dsi,
> reg = samsung_dsim_read(dsi, DSIM_STATUS_REG);
> } while ((reg & DSIM_PLL_STABLE) == 0);
>
> + dsi->hs_clock = fout;
> +
> return fout;
> }
>
> @@ -698,13 +702,46 @@ static void samsung_dsim_set_phy_ctrl(struct samsung_dsim *dsi)
> const struct samsung_dsim_driver_data *driver_data = dsi->driver_data;
> const unsigned int *reg_values = driver_data->reg_values;
> u32 reg;
> + struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy cfg;
> + int clk_prepare, lpx, clk_zero, clk_post, clk_trail;
> + int hs_exit, hs_prepare, hs_zero, hs_trail;
> + unsigned long long byte_clock = dsi->hs_clock / 8;
>
> if (driver_data->has_freqband)
> return;
>
> + phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config_for_hsclk(dsi->hs_clock,
> + dsi->lanes, &cfg);
> +
> + /*
> + * TODO:
> + * The tech reference manual for i.MX8M Mini/Nano/Plus
Does it mean, Applications Processor Reference Manual? better add it
clear reference.
> + * doesn't state what the definition of the PHYTIMING
> + * bits are beyond their address and bit position.
> + * After reviewing NXP's downstream code, it appears
> + * that the various PHYTIMING registers take the number
> + * of cycles and use various dividers on them. This
> + * calculation does not result in an exact match to the
> + * downstream code, but it is very close, and it appears
> + * to sync at a variety of resolutions. If someone
> + * can get a more accurate mathematical equation needed
> + * for these registers, this should be updated.
> + */
> +
> + lpx = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.lpx, byte_clock);
> + hs_exit = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.hs_exit, byte_clock);
> + clk_prepare = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.clk_prepare, byte_clock);
> + clk_zero = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.clk_zero, byte_clock);
> + clk_post = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.clk_post, byte_clock);
> + clk_trail = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.clk_trail, byte_clock);
> + hs_prepare = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.hs_prepare, byte_clock);
> + hs_zero = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.hs_zero, byte_clock);
> + hs_trail = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.hs_trail, byte_clock);
I think we can do some kind of negotiation has done similar in bsp by
taking inputs from bit_clk and PLL_1432X table. Did you try this? we
thought this approach while writing dsim to support dynamic dphy.
Thanks,
Jagan.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists