[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB52766D2B3D4EEA58D540FA858C7E9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 02:14:59 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
CC: "jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
"yishaih@...dia.com" <yishaih@...dia.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"darwi@...utronix.de" <darwi@...utronix.de>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com" <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V5 00/11] vfio/pci: Support dynamic allocation of MSI-X
interrupts
> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 6:53 AM
>
> On Thu, 11 May 2023 08:44:27 -0700
> Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > Changes since V4:
> > - V4:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1682615447.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
> /
> > - Add Kevin's Reviewed-by tag as applicable.
> > - Treat non-existing INTx interrupt context as kernel bug with WARN. This
> > exposed an issue in the scenario where INTx mask/unmask may occur
> without
> > INTx enabled. This is fixed by obtaining the interrupt context later
> > (right before use) within impacted functions: vfio_pci_intx_mask() and
> > vfio_pci_intx_unmask_handler(). (Kevin)
> > - Treat pci_irq_vector() returning '0' for a MSI/MSI-X interrupt as a kernel
> > bug via a WARN instead of ignoring this value. (Kevin)
> > - Improve accuracy of comments. (Kevin)
> > - Please refer to individual patches for local changes.
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Kevin, do you want to add any additional reviews or check the changes
> made based on your previous comments?
>
Good to me too. I've given the remaining reviewed-by's.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists