[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230517133112.873856-1-trix@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 09:31:12 -0400
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: bskeggs@...hat.com, kherbst@...hat.com, lyude@...hat.com,
airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, gsamaiya@...dia.com
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/acr/ga102: set variable ga102_gsps storage-class-specifier to static
smatch reports
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/ga102.c:49:1: warning: symbol
'ga102_gsps' was not declared. Should it be static?
This variable is only used in its defining file, so it should be static
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/ga102.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/ga102.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/ga102.c
index 525267412c3e..a3996ceca995 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/ga102.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/ga102.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ ga102_gsp_nofw(struct nvkm_gsp *gsp, int ver, const struct nvkm_gsp_fwif *fwif)
return 0;
}
-struct nvkm_gsp_fwif
+static struct nvkm_gsp_fwif
ga102_gsps[] = {
{ -1, ga102_gsp_nofw, &ga102_gsp },
{}
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists