[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGTmOtl8oqMdMmtY@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 23:35:38 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Börge Strümpfel <boerge.struempfel@...il.com>
Cc: bstruempfel@...ratronik.de, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] spi: dt-bindings: Introduce spi-mosi-idle-low flag
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:26:07AM +0200, Börge Strümpfel wrote:
> However I am not so sure about setting it unconditionally, since this
> is dependent on the spi-controller. Not all spi-controller show this
> behavior, that they use a high mosi line in idle mode and have the
> ability to change this. As far as I know, another common behavior
> is that the mosi just keeps the last state which it transmitted. In this
> case, devices like Neopixel would still work without this mode bit.
The behaviour the device needs is that the device have a low MOSI, how
that is achieved is immaterial.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists