lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2023 13:35:54 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
Cc:     masahiroy@...nel.org, vbabka@...e.cz, peterz@...radead.org,
        paulmck@...nel.org, rppt@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init: Add bdev fs printk if mount_block_root failed

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:02 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 May 2023 11:53:21 +0800 Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com> wrote:
>
> > Attempt to printk all bdev fstype as root gives the following kernel panic:
> >
> > [    1.729006] VFS: Cannot open root device "vda" or unknown-block(253,0): error -19
> > [    1.730603] Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions:
> > [    1.732323] fd00          256000 vda
> > [    1.732329]  driver: virtio_blk
> > [    1.734194] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(253,0)
> > [    1.734771] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc2+ #53
> > [    1.735194] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
> > [    1.735772] Call Trace:
> > [    1.735950]  <TASK>
> > [    1.736113]  dump_stack_lvl+0x32/0x50
> > [    1.736367]  panic+0x108/0x310
> > [    1.736570]  mount_block_root+0x161/0x310
> > [    1.736849]  ? rdinit_setup+0x40/0x40
> > [    1.737088]  prepare_namespace+0x10c/0x180
> > [    1.737393]  kernel_init_freeable+0x354/0x450
> > [    1.737707]  ? rest_init+0xd0/0xd0
> > [    1.737945]  kernel_init+0x16/0x130
> > [    1.738196]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> >
> > QEMU command line:
> > "qemu-system-x86_64 -append root=/dev/vda rootfstype=ext4 ..."
> >
> > This error is because ext4 is not buildin and request ext4 module fail.

Cool! I'm glad this got picked up; I personally find it confusing when
trying to start from something like an allnoconfig build then start
enabling configs then hitting this panic; it's unclear to users that
they are missing the config for the FS they are trying to load and on
first glance looks like something much worse is going wrong.  In that
sense, I view this as a win. Thanks for the patch!

Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>

I wish the commit message showed an example of the panic after the
patch, to contrast the before vs. after.

> >
> > As a hint, printk all the bdev fstype available for prompts.
> >
>
> Seems reasonable.  I reworded the changelog a bit:
>
> : Booting with the QEMU command line:
> : "qemu-system-x86_64 -append root=/dev/vda rootfstype=ext4 ..."
> : will panic if ext4 is not builtin and a request to load the ext4 module
> : fails.
> :
> : [    1.729006] VFS: Cannot open root device "vda" or unknown-block(253,0): error -19
> : [    1.730603] Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions:
> : [    1.732323] fd00          256000 vda
> : [    1.732329]  driver: virtio_blk
> : [    1.734194] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(253,0)
> : [    1.734771] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc2+ #53
> : [    1.735194] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
> : [    1.735772] Call Trace:
> : [    1.735950]  <TASK>
> : [    1.736113]  dump_stack_lvl+0x32/0x50
> : [    1.736367]  panic+0x108/0x310
> : [    1.736570]  mount_block_root+0x161/0x310
> : [    1.736849]  ? rdinit_setup+0x40/0x40
> : [    1.737088]  prepare_namespace+0x10c/0x180
> : [    1.737393]  kernel_init_freeable+0x354/0x450
> : [    1.737707]  ? rest_init+0xd0/0xd0
> : [    1.737945]  kernel_init+0x16/0x130
> : [    1.738196]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> :
> : As a hint, print all the bdev fstypes which are available.
>
> > --- a/init/do_mounts.c
> > +++ b/init/do_mounts.c
> > @@ -427,8 +427,19 @@ void __init mount_block_root(char *name, int flags)
> >               printk("VFS: Cannot open root device \"%s\" or %s: error %d\n",
> >                               root_device_name, b, err);
> >               printk("Please append a correct \"root=\" boot option; here are the available partitions:\n");
> > -
> >               printk_all_partitions();
> > +
> > +             if (root_fs_names)
> > +                     num_fs = list_bdev_fs_names(fs_names, PAGE_SIZE);
> > +             if (!num_fs)
> > +                     pr_err("Can't find any bdev filesystem to be used for mount!\n");
> > +             else {
> > +                     pr_err("List of all bdev filesystem:\n");
> > +                     for (i = 0, p = fs_names; i < num_fs; i++, p += strlen(p)+1)
> > +                             pr_err(" %s", p);
> > +                     pr_err("\n");
> > +             }
> > +
> >               panic("VFS: Unable to mount root fs on %s", b);
> >       }
> >       if (!(flags & SB_RDONLY)) {
>
> And I added a little fix.
>
> --- a/init/do_mounts.c~init-add-bdev-fs-printk-if-mount_block_root-failed-fix
> +++ a/init/do_mounts.c
> @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ retry:
>                 if (!num_fs)
>                         pr_err("Can't find any bdev filesystem to be used for mount!\n");
>                 else {
> -                       pr_err("List of all bdev filesystem:\n");
> +                       pr_err("List of all bdev filesystems:\n");
>                         for (i = 0, p = fs_names; i < num_fs; i++, p += strlen(p)+1)
>                                 pr_err(" %s", p);
>                         pr_err("\n");
> _
>
>
> This function now uses a jumble of printk() and pr_err().  Perhaps
> someone will go through and rationalize all of this sometime.
>


-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ