[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN7PR12MB720147CE15B2F018F3E7D5AF8B7F9@SN7PR12MB7201.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 04:58:38 +0000
From: "Havalige, Thippeswamy" <thippeswamy.havalige@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"michals@...inx.com" <michals@...inx.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Yeleswarapu, Nagaradhesh" <nagaradhesh.yeleswarapu@....com>,
"Gogada, Bharat Kumar" <bharat.kumar.gogada@....com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] PCI: xilinx-xdma: Add Xilinx XDMA Root Port driver
Hi Bjorn,
Regards,
Thippeswamy H
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2023 1:03 AM
> To: Havalige, Thippeswamy <thippeswamy.havalige@....com>
> Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org;
> bhelgaas@...gle.com; michals@...inx.com; robh+dt@...nel.org;
> Yeleswarapu, Nagaradhesh <nagaradhesh.yeleswarapu@....com>; Gogada,
> Bharat Kumar <bharat.kumar.gogada@....com>;
> lorenzo.pieralisi@....com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] PCI: xilinx-xdma: Add Xilinx XDMA Root Port driver
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 11:57:25AM +0530, Thippeswamy Havalige wrote:
> > Add support for Xilinx XDMA Soft IP core as Root Port.
> > ...
>
> > +#include <linux/of_pci.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
>
> The trend seems to be to alphabetize the system includes above.
- Agreed, fix it in next patch
> > +#include "pcie-xilinx-common.h"
> > +
> > +#include "../pci.h"
- Agreed, fix it in next patch
> Put the pcie-xilinx-common.h include here, as you did for
> pcie-xilinx-cpm.c:
>
> #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
>
> #include "../pci.h"
> #include "pcie-xilinx-common.h"
- Agreed, fix it in next patch
> pcie-xilinx.c has a very similar list of register definitions, which makes me
> wonder why it can't share pcie-xilinx-common.h as well.
>
> Obviously it would take a bit of rework since it uses BIT(x) instead of just "x".
> But you hide the "BIT()" inside IMR(), which is arguably slightly obscure since
> the #define value is not a register mask:
>
> > +#define IMR(x) BIT(XILINX_PCIE_INTR_ ##x)
>
> I don't really care either way, but it seems like a possibly needless difference.
> Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists