linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: clocks: atmel,at91rm9200-pmc: convert to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 May 2023 06:03:21 +0000
From:   <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
To:     <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>,
        <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC:     <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: clocks: atmel,at91rm9200-pmc: convert
 to yaml

On 17.05.2023 17:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 17/05/2023 11:41, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>> Convert Atmel PMC documentation to yaml. Along with it clock names
>> were adapted according to the current available device trees as
>> different controller versions accept different clock (some of them
>> have 3 clocks as input, some has 2 clocks as inputs and some with 2
>> input clocks uses different clock names).
> 
> Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.
> 
> 
>> +
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            enum:
>> +              - atmel,at91rm9200-pmc
>> +              - atmel,at91sam9260-pmc
>> +              - atmel,at91sam9g20-pmc
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        clocks:
>> +          minItems: 2
>> +          maxItems: 2
>> +        clock-names:
>> +          items:
>> +            - const: slow_xtal
>> +            - const: main_xtal
>> +
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            enum:
>> +              - atmel,sama5d2-pmc
>> +              - atmel,sama5d3-pmc
>> +              - atmel,sama5d4-pmc
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        clocks:
>> +          minItems: 2
>> +          maxItems: 2
>> +        clock-names:
>> +          items:
>> +            - const: slow_clk
>> +            - const: main_xtal
> 
> This and previous if, should be squashed. You have exactly the same then:.

Clock names are different. Or do you propose to have a if for
clocks:
  minItems: 2
  maxItems: 2

and 2 ifs for clock names?

> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>