linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 4/4] Documentation: kunit: Add usage notes for kunit_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230518083849.2631178-4-davidgow@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2023 16:38:46 +0800
From:   David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To:     Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
        Benjamin Berg <benjamin@...solutions.net>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
Cc:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Sadiya Kazi <sadiyakazi@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] Documentation: kunit: Add usage notes for kunit_add_action()

Add some basic documentation for kunit_add_action() and related
deferred action functions.

Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
---

This patch is new in v2.

---
 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
index 46957d1cbcbb..c2f0ed648385 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
@@ -615,6 +615,57 @@ For example:
 		KUNIT_ASSERT_STREQ(test, buffer, "");
 	}
 
+Registering Cleanup Actions
+---------------------------
+
+If you need to perform some cleanup beyond simple use of ``kunit_kzalloc``,
+you can register a cusom "deferred action", which is a cleanup function
+run when the test exits (whether cleanly, or via a failed assertion).
+
+Actions are simple functions with no return value, and a single ``void*``
+context argument, and forfil the same role as "cleanup" functions in Python
+and Go tests, "defer" statements in languages which support them, and
+(in some cases) destructors in RAII languages.
+
+These are very useful for unregistering things from global lists, closing
+files or other resources, or freeing resources.
+
+For example:
+
+.. code-block:: C
+
+	static void cleanup_device(void *ctx)
+	{
+		struct device *dev = (struct device *)ctx;
+
+		device_unregister(dev);
+	}
+
+	void example_device_test(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		struct my_device dev;
+
+		device_register(&dev);
+
+		kunit_add_action(test, &cleanup_device, &dev);
+	}
+
+Note that, for functions like device_unregister which only accept a single
+pointer-sized argument, it's possible to directly cast that function to
+a ``kunit_action_t`` rather than writing a wrapper function, for example:
+
+.. code-block:: C
+
+	kunit_add_action(test, (kunit_action_t *)&device_unregister, &dev);
+
+``kunit_add_action`` can fail if, for example, the system is out of memory.
+You can use ``kunit_add_action_or_reset`` instead which runs the action
+immediately if it cannot be deferred.
+
+If you need more control over when the cleanup function is called, you
+can trigger it early using ``kunit_release_action``, or cancel it entirely
+with ``kunit_remove_action``.
+
 
 Testing Static Functions
 ------------------------
-- 
2.40.1.698.g37aff9b760-goog