[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c2adf29-c201-9534-cc07-d35c4dead948@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 20:01:45 -0500
From: Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: oleg@...hat.com, linux@...mhuis.info, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, mst@...hat.com,
sgarzare@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, stefanha@...hat.com,
brauner@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] vhost/vhost_task: Hook vhost layer into signal
handler
On 5/17/23 7:16 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 5:09 PM Mike Christie
> <michael.christie@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> + rc = get_signal(&ksig);
>> + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>> + return rc;
>
> The games with current_state seem nonsensical.
>
> What are they all about? get_signal() shouldn't care, and no other
> caller does this thing. This just seems completely random.
Sorry. It's a leftover.
I was originally calling this from vhost_task_should_stop where before
calling that function we do a:
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
So, I was hitting get_signal->try_to_freeze->might_sleep->__might_sleep
and was getting the "do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING"
warnings.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists