linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: eud: Add SM6115 / SM4250 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAH=2Ntw2nAAsddNBULeoHM6F0dpX1ef31LDbBH7AiHeeyDJWgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2023 14:30:49 +0530
From:   Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
        konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bhupesh.linux@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, quic_schowdhu@...cinc.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: eud: Add SM6115 / SM4250 support

Hi Krzysztof,

On Thu, 18 May 2023 at 13:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 17/05/2023 23:17, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > Add dt-bindings for EUD found on Qualcomm SM6115 / SM4250 SoC.
> >
> > On this SoC (and derivatives) the enable bit inside 'tcsr_check_reg'
> > needs to be set first to 'enable' the eud module.
> >
> > So, update the dt-bindings to accommodate the third register
> > property (TCSR Base) required by the driver on these SoCs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the
> tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the
> version they apply.
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>
> Also - no improvements.

Oops, seems I missed your review on v5 due to a label filter for
'linux-usb' list.
I will take care in future versions.

Please let me know if the R-B tag is still valid though :)

Thanks.