[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230518094340.GC404509@google.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 10:43:40 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Benjamin Bara <bbara93@...il.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com, peterz@...radead.org,
jonathanh@...dia.com, richard.leitner@...ux.dev,
treding@...dia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@...data.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] mfd: tps6586x: use devm-based power off handler
On Tue, 09 May 2023, Benjamin Bara wrote:
> From: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@...data.com>
>
> Convert the power off handler to a devm-based power off handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@...data.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Do the 2 MFD patches depend on the others?
For my own reference (apply this as-is to your sign-off block):
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists