linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] tools/testing/cxl: Document test configurations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230518105020.0000424a@Huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2023 10:50:20 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
CC:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        "Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@...nel.org>,
        <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tools/testing/cxl: Document test configurations

On Wed, 17 May 2023 14:28:12 -0700
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com> wrote:

> The devices created, their relationship, and intended testing purpose is
> not extremely clear, especially for those unfamiliar with cxl-test.
> 
> Document the purpose of each hierarchy.  Add ASCII art to show the
> relationship of devices.  Group the device declarations together based
> on the hierarchies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>

Trivial nitpicks below :)

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

> ---
>  tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c b/tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c
> index bf00dc52fe96..bd38a5fb60ae 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/cxl/test/cxl.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,31 @@ static int interleave_arithmetic;
>  #define NR_CXL_PORT_DECODERS 8
>  #define NR_BRIDGES (NR_CXL_HOST_BRIDGES + NR_CXL_SINGLE_HOST + NR_CXL_RCH)
>  
> +/*
> + * Interleave testing

Doesn't include the cfmws, which will be tricky to draw, but maybe you could
add something to indicate they interleave over the two HB sometimes?

> + *
> + *             +---------------+                            +---------------+
> + *             | host_bridge[0]|                            | host_bridge[1]|
> + *             +-/---------\---+                            +--/---------\--+
Text for host bridges is right aligned.
> + *             /-           -\                               /-           -\
> + *           /-               -\                           /-               -\
> + *   +-------------+         +-------------+       +-------------+      +-------------+
> + *   |root_port[0] |         |root_port[1] |       |root_port[2] |      |root_port[3] |
> + *   +------|------+         +------|------+       +------|------+      +------|------+
and root ports are left aligned.
I'd shrink both boxes so they are same as the switches below - or expand them to give
a space on either side of the text.


> + *          |                       |                     |                    |
> + *  +-------|-------+       +-------|-------+     +-------|-------+    +-------|-------+
> + *  |switch_uport[0]|       |switch_uport[1]|     |switch_uport[2]|    |switch_uport[3]|
> + *  +---|-------|---+       +---/-------|---+     +---/-------|---+    +---|-------\---+
> + *      |       \              /        \            /        \            /        \
> + * +----|----++--|------++---------++----|----++---------++----|----++----|----++---------+
> + * |switch   ||switch   ||switch   ||switch   ||switch   ||switch   ||switch   ||switch   |
> + * |_dport[0]||_dport[1]||_dport[2]||_dport[3]||_dport[4]||_dport[5]||_dport[6]||_dport[7]|
> + * +----|----++--|------++----|----++----|----++----|----++----|----++----|----++----|----+
> + *      |        |            |          |          |          |          |          |
> + *  +---|--+   +-|----+   +---|--+   +---|--+    +--|---+  +---|--+   +---|--+   +---|--+
> + *  |mem[0]|   |mem[1]|   |mem[2]|   |mem[3]|    |mem[4]|  |mem[5]|   |mem[6]|   |mem[7]|
> + *  +------+   +------+   +------+   +------+    +------+  +------+   +------+   +------+
> + */
>  static struct platform_device *cxl_acpi;
>  static struct platform_device *cxl_host_bridge[NR_CXL_HOST_BRIDGES];
>  #define NR_MULTI_ROOT (NR_CXL_HOST_BRIDGES * NR_CXL_ROOT_PORTS)
> @@ -31,16 +56,51 @@ static struct platform_device *cxl_switch_uport[NR_MULTI_ROOT];
>  #define NR_MEM_MULTI \
>  	(NR_CXL_HOST_BRIDGES * NR_CXL_ROOT_PORTS * NR_CXL_SWITCH_PORTS)
>  static struct platform_device *cxl_switch_dport[NR_MEM_MULTI];
> +struct platform_device *cxl_mem[NR_MEM_MULTI];
>  
> +/*
> + * 1) Preconfigured region support (Simulated BIOS configured region)
> + * 2) 'Pass-through' decoder
> + *
> + *       +---------------+
> + *       |  hb_single    |
> + *       +------|--------+
> + *              |
> + *       +------|--------+
> + *       | root_single   |
> + *       +------|--------+
> + *              |
> + *   +----------|----------+
> + *   |     swu_single      |
> + *   +-----|-----------|---+
> + *         |           |
> + *   +-----|-----+  +--|--------+
> + *   |swd_single |  | swd_single|
> + *   +-----|-----+  +----|------+
> + *         |             |
> + *  +------|-----+  +----|-------+
> + *  |mem_single  |  |mem_single  |
> + *  +------------+  +------------+
mem[0] etc?  Also swd_single[0] etc?

For consistency with above.

> + */
>  static struct platform_device *cxl_hb_single[NR_CXL_SINGLE_HOST];
>  static struct platform_device *cxl_root_single[NR_CXL_SINGLE_HOST];
>  static struct platform_device *cxl_swu_single[NR_CXL_SINGLE_HOST];
>  #define NR_MEM_SINGLE (NR_CXL_SINGLE_HOST * NR_CXL_SWITCH_PORTS)
>  static struct platform_device *cxl_swd_single[NR_MEM_SINGLE];
> -
> -struct platform_device *cxl_mem[NR_MEM_MULTI];
>  struct platform_device *cxl_mem_single[NR_MEM_SINGLE];
>  
> +/*
> + * 1) RCD
> + * 2) Type-2 (Accelerator)
> + *
> + *  +-----+
> + *  | rch |
> + *  +--|--+
> + *     |
> + *   +-|--+
> + *   |rcd |
> + *   +----+
> + */
>  static struct platform_device *cxl_rch[NR_CXL_RCH];
>  static struct platform_device *cxl_rcd[NR_CXL_RCH];
>  
> @@ -64,6 +124,17 @@ static inline bool is_single_bridge(struct device *dev)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + *  +---------------+ +---------------+
> + *  | host_bridge[0]| | host_bridge[1]|
> + *  +---------------+ +---------------+
> + *  +---------------+
> + *  |  hb_single    | (host_bridge[2])
> + *  +---------------+
> + *  +-----+
> + *  | rch | (host_bridge[3])
> + *  +-----+
> + */

Not sure what this diagram is illustrating...

>  static struct acpi_device acpi0017_mock;
>  static struct acpi_device host_bridge[NR_BRIDGES] = {
>  	[0] = {
>