linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: riscv: deprecate riscv,isa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230518-resurrect-copy-0ecd9eaaca1e@wendy>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2023 12:25:11 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
CC:     <palmer@...belt.com>, <conor@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>,
        Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@...c27.com>,
        Rick Chen <rick@...estech.com>, Leo <ycliang@...estech.com>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <qemu-riscv@...gnu.org>,
        <u-boot@...ts.denx.de>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: riscv: deprecate riscv,isa

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:31:51PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > +  # Additional Standard Extensions, sorted by category then alphabetically
> 
> Can we just do pure alphabetically? And the single-letter extensions above
> don't have a "sorted by" comment above them. I guess they need one, or
> maybe they can also be alphabetical?

Maybe it is just me, but my brain is too used to seeing those ones in
something approaching canonical order. I'd rather keep them that way &
then alphanumerical for everything else?

I also noticed that the CMO stuff wasn't actually in the comment's order
anyway, so needs a re-sort to begin with. A vote in favour of
alphanumerical.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)