[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4bc7385-3706-8aa3-0117-d106fd47a45e@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 20:15:50 +0800
From: zhuyinbo <zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>,
Baoqi Zhang <zhangbaoqi@...ngson.cn>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Yun Liu <liuyun@...ngson.cn>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>, wanghongliang@...ngson.cn,
Liu Peibao <liupeibao@...ngson.cn>,
loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn, zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] dt-bindings: soc: add loongson-2 pm
在 2023/5/18 下午3:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
> On 18/05/2023 05:23, zhuyinbo wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2023/5/17 下午11:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>>> On 17/05/2023 09:31, Yinbo Zhu wrote:
>>>> Add the Loongson-2 SoC Power Management Controller binding with DT
>>>> schema format using json-schema.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> +properties:
>>>> + compatible:
>>>> + items:
>>>> + - enum:
>>>> + - loongson,ls2k-pmc
>>>> + - const: syscon
>>>> +
>>>> + reg:
>>>> + maxItems: 1
>>>> +
>>>> + interrupts:
>>>> + maxItems: 1
>>>> +
>>>> + suspend-address:
>>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>>> + description:
>>>> + This option indicate this PM suspend address.
>>>
>>> This tells me nothing. Drop "This option indicate this" and rephrase
>>> everything to actually describe this property. Why would the address
>>> differ on given, specific SoC? It looks like you just miss compatibles.
>>> Anyway this needs much more explanation so we can judge whether it fits DT.
>>
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> I will add following description about "suspend-address", please review.
>
> Thanks.
>
>>
>> The "suspend-address" is a ACPI S3 (Suspend To RAM) firmware entry
>
> Why do we add properties for ACPI? This does not seem right.
1. The suspend-address value was dependent on specific platform
firmware code and it tends to be confiurable. if it is a fixed value
that seems not friendly or the ACPI S3 will not work.
2. the PM driver need according to it to indicate that current SoC
whether support ACPI S3, because some Loongson-2 SoC doesn't support
ACPI S3 but support other ACPI mode, so the PM driver need has a
check. if no this check and other ACPI mode will not work.
Base on the above two points, this property was necessary.
Using this property "suspend-address" can make the firmware entry
address configurable, and then the kernel can also indicate whether
the current SoC supports S3
In addition, from kernel code perspective, the property
"suspend-address" was to initialize "loongarch_suspend_addr"
S3 call flow:
enter_state -> loongson_suspend_enter -> bios's loongarch_suspend_addr
SYM_FUNC_START(loongson_suspend_enter)
SETUP_SLEEP
bl __flush_cache_all
/* Pass RA and SP to BIOS */
addi.d a1, sp, 0
la.pcrel a0, loongson_wakeup_start
la.pcrel t0, loongarch_suspend_addr
ld.d t0, t0, 0
jirl a0, t0, 0 /* Call BIOS's STR sleep routine */
Please
> reword to skip ACPI stuff, e.g. deep sleep states (Suspend to RAM).
Sorry, I don't got your point.
>
>
>> address which was jumped from kernel and it's value was dependent on
>> specific platform firmware code.
>
> "entry address which was jumped" <- the address cannot jump. Please
> explain who is jumping here - boot CPU? each suspended CPU? I guess the
> first as CPUs are offlined, right?
The boot CPU was jumping to firmware and finish remaining process in
firmware that was what ACPI S3 required and other CPUs (No-boot CPU)
have been offline before entering firmware.
>
>> In addition, the PM driver need
>> according to it to indicate that current SoC whether support ACPI S3.
>
> Skip references to driver.
Sorry, I don't got your point. Could you elaborate on it?
Thanks
Yinbo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists