linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 0/8] vhost_tasks: Use CLONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230518000920.191583-1-michael.christie@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2023 19:09:12 -0500
From:   Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>
To:     oleg@...hat.com, linux@...mhuis.info, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
        axboe@...nel.dk, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, mst@...hat.com,
        sgarzare@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, stefanha@...hat.com,
        brauner@...nel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/8] vhost_tasks: Use CLONE_THREAD/SIGHAND

This patch allows the vhost and vhost_task code to use CLONE_THREAD,
CLONE_SIGHAND and CLONE_FILES. It's a RFC because I didn't do all the
normal testing, haven't coverted vsock and vdpa, and I know you guys
will not like the first patch. However, I think it better shows what
we need from the signal code and how we can support signals in the
vhost_task layer.

Note that I took the super simple route and kicked off some work to
the system workqueue. We can do more invassive approaches:
1. Modify the vhost drivers so they can check for IO completions using
a non-blocking interface. We then don't need to run from the system
workqueue and can run from the vhost_task.

2. We could drop patch 1 and just say we are doing a polling type
of approach. We then modify the vhost layer similar to #1 where we
can check for completions using a non-blocking interface and use
the vhost_task task.