[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230518093049.1e1cdf9561ea326f4655af02@hugovil.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 09:30:49 -0400
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: sc16is7xx: Add property to change GPIO
function
On Wed, 17 May 2023 18:25:07 +0100
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:07:46AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> >
> > Some variants in this series of uart controllers have GPIO pins that
> > are shared between GPIO and modem control lines.
> >
> > The pin mux mode (GPIO or modem control lines) can be set for each
> > ports (channels) supported by the variant.
> >
> > This adds a property to the device tree to set the GPIO pin mux to
> > modem control lines on selected ports if needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt
> > index 0fa8e3e43bf8..426b7285ad50 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/nxp,sc16is7xx.txt
> > @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ Optional properties:
> > 1 = active low.
> > - irda-mode-ports: An array that lists the indices of the port that
> > should operate in IrDA mode.
> > +- modem-control-line-ports: An array that lists the indices of the port that
> > + should have shared GPIO lines configured as modem
> > + control lines.
>
> If this is an NXP specific property, should it not have an nxp, vendor
> prefix?
Yes, I will resubmit a V2 with nxp vendor prefix.
Hugo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists