[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230518180809.GA5817@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 20:08:10 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>, linux@...mhuis.info,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, axboe@...nel.dk, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, mst@...hat.com,
sgarzare@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, stefanha@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] signal: Dequeue SIGKILL even if
SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT/group_exec_task is set
On 05/18, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> Yeah, but these are issues that exist with PF_IO_WORKER then too
This was my thought too but I am starting to think I was wrong.
Of course I don't understand the code in io_uring/ but it seems
that it always breaks the IO loops if get_signal() returns SIGKILL.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists