[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGfANz/aJp2WtXSp@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 11:30:15 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
CC: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
"yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
"lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] iommufd: Add IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_HW_INFO
Hi Kevin,
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 08:42:07AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > +};
> > +#define IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_HW_INFO _IO(IOMMUFD_TYPE,
> > IOMMUFD_CMD_DEVICE_GET_HW_INFO)
> > #endif
>
> Here we have a naming confusion.
>
> 'IOMMU' is the prefix of iommufd ioctls.
>
> 'DEVICE' is the subjective.
>
> Then "GET_HW_INFO" implies getting hardware info related to
> this device. then it should not be restricted to the iommu info.
>
> with that it's clearer to call it IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_IOMMU_INFO.
Though the entire ioctl is tied to the input "dev_id", I think
it isn't really about the device corresponding to the dev_id,
similar to the IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC having a dev_id input too. So,
I think the "IOMMU_DEVICE" here should be interpreted simply
as "an iommu device". We could also highlight this somewhere
in the header.
With that being said, IOMMU_DEVICE_SET/UNSET_DATA should be
renamed to IOMMU_DEVICE_SET/UNSET_DEV_DATA -- "DEVICE" is the
iommu device while the "DEV_DATA" is a given device that's
behind the iommu.
> similarly for struct iommu_hw_info.
>
> 'iommu' is the prefix for all iommufd ioctl structures.
>
> then 'hw_info' is too broard.
>
> iommu_device_iommu_info reads better? though having two
> iommu's in the name is a little bit annoying...
How about:
IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_FEATURES
struct iommu_device_features
?
Thanks
Nic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists