linux-kernel - [PATCH 04/24] workqueue: Rename wq->cpu_pwqs to wq->cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230519001709.2563-5-tj@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2023 14:16:49 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     jiangshanlai@...il.com
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
        joshdon@...gle.com, brho@...gle.com, briannorris@...omium.org,
        nhuck@...gle.com, agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org,
        void@...ifault.com, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/24] workqueue: Rename wq->cpu_pwqs to wq->cpu_pwq

wq->cpu_pwqs is a percpu variable carraying one pointer to a pool_workqueue.
The field name being plural is unusual and confusing. Rename it to singular.

This patch doesn't cause any functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 0d5eb436d31a..80b2bd01c718 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
 
 	/* hot fields used during command issue, aligned to cacheline */
 	unsigned int		flags ____cacheline_aligned; /* WQ: WQ_* flags */
-	struct pool_workqueue __percpu *cpu_pwqs; /* I: per-cpu pwqs */
+	struct pool_workqueue __percpu *cpu_pwq; /* I: per-cpu pwqs */
 	struct pool_workqueue __rcu *numa_pwq_tbl[]; /* PWR: unbound pwqs indexed by node */
 };
 
@@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	} else {
 		if (req_cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
 			cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-		pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
+		pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu);
 	}
 
 	pool = pwq->pool;
@@ -3807,7 +3807,7 @@ static void rcu_free_wq(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 	wq_free_lockdep(wq);
 
 	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
-		free_percpu(wq->cpu_pwqs);
+		free_percpu(wq->cpu_pwq);
 	else
 		free_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs);
 
@@ -4501,13 +4501,13 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 	int cpu, ret;
 
 	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
-		wq->cpu_pwqs = alloc_percpu(struct pool_workqueue);
-		if (!wq->cpu_pwqs)
+		wq->cpu_pwq = alloc_percpu(struct pool_workqueue);
+		if (!wq->cpu_pwq)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
 		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 			struct pool_workqueue *pwq =
-				per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
+				per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu);
 			struct worker_pool *cpu_pools =
 				per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu);
 
@@ -4888,7 +4888,7 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 		cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
 	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
-		pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
+		pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu);
 	else
 		pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, cpu_to_node(cpu));
 
-- 
2.40.1