[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1be99c1ede70b5c385acc16b59347d02.paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 16:54:36 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@...anix.com>, eparis@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, audit@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] audit: refactor queue full checks
On May 11, 2023 Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@...anix.com> wrote:
>
> Currently audit queue full checks are done in multiple places.
> Consolidate them into one audit_queue_full().
>
> Signed-off-by: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@...anix.com>
> ---
> kernel/audit.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 9bc0b0301198..c15694e1a76b 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -341,6 +341,12 @@ static inline int audit_rate_check(void)
> return retval;
> }
>
> +static inline int audit_queue_full(const struct sk_buff_head *queue)
> +{
> + return audit_backlog_limit &&
> + (skb_queue_len(queue) > audit_backlog_limit);
> +}
Regardless of the other patches in this series, this seems like a
good candidate to merge, but could you make it return a 'bool'
instead of an 'int'?
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists