[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0898a8ee-1d41-4ad5-8312-a0b417026aea@kili.mountain>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 07:27:18 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Neil Leeder <nleeder@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: qcom_l2_pmu: Make l2_cache_pmu_probe_cluster()
more robust
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> But it looks cleaner and could silence static checker warning.
Thanks Christophe,
Of course, you found found this with your Coccinelle script so
technically it already silences a static checker warning... But I
ran into two list related use after frees yesterday so I'm definitely
going to create a Smatch warning which will trigger here as well.
I'm NOT going to add a if (if_list_is_devm()) exception because I feel
like that encourages subtle code and because devm_ lifetimes are
complicated.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists