[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525c424f-a748-80f5-5a16-ca979bc77864@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 14:53:40 +1000 (AEST)
From: Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] Docs/scsi: introduction: multiple cleanups
On Thu, 18 May 2023, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Modify URLs to use https instead of http.
> Remove ancient URLs that don't work.
> Change "scsi" in text to "SCSI".
> Change "cdrom" in text to "CD-ROM".
> Drop the reference to "autoclean" for modules since I can't
> find it in any current documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
> Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> Documentation/scsi/scsi.rst | 23 ++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff -- a/Documentation/scsi/scsi.rst b/Documentation/scsi/scsi.rst
> --- a/Documentation/scsi/scsi.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/scsi/scsi.rst
> @@ -6,30 +6,28 @@ SCSI subsystem documentation
>
> The Linux Documentation Project (LDP) maintains a document describing
> the SCSI subsystem in the Linux kernel (lk) 2.4 series. See:
> -http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/SCSI-2.4-HOWTO . The LDP has single
> +https://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/SCSI-2.4-HOWTO . The LDP has single
> and multiple page HTML renderings as well as postscript and pdf.
> -It can also be found at:
> -http://web.archive.org/web/%2E/http://www.torque.net/scsi/SCSI-2.4-HOWTO
>
That link got corrupted by commit b7223d9bdec. It used to be
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.torque.net/scsi/SCSI-2.4-HOWTO
which does actually work.
FWIW, I'm not in favour of replacing any links with archive.org links
unless no better source can be found. I am in favour of citations in the
form of a link with retrieval date. In this context the date can often be
inferred from commit or release dates.
Therefore, a second commit, 0ea6e611221, could also be reverted with
regards to this link (if you're planning to edit it). Just my $0.02.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists