[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d831dd2-8be3-2061-e566-7d1d4e95c10d@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 11:19:48 +0530
From: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
<mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
<sboyd@...nel.org>, <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>,
<loic.poulain@...aro.org>, <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>,
<robimarko@...il.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>,
<quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com>, <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>,
<quic_arajkuma@...cinc.com>, <quic_anusha@...cinc.com>,
<quic_poovendh@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] arm64: dtsi: qcom: ipq5018: enable nodes required
for multipd
On 3/7/2023 9:11 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/03/2023 05:41, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>> Enable nodes required for multipd remoteproc bring up
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 130 insertions(+)
>> soc: soc@0 {
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <1>;
>> @@ -217,5 +259,93 @@ frame@...8000 {
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>> };
>> +
>> + tcsr_mutex: hwlock@...5000 {
>
> This does not look like in correct order. Don't stuff things to the end
> of lists.
>
Sure. I will keep nodes as per order.
>> + compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex";
>> + reg = <0x01905000 0x8000>;
>> + #hwlock-cells = <1>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + apcs_glb: mailbox@...1000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,ipq5018-apcs-apps-global";
>> + reg = <0x0b111000 0x1000>;
>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>> + #mbox-cells = <1>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + q6v5_wcss: remoteproc@...0000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,ipq5018-q6-mpd";
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>> + ranges;
>> + reg = <0x0cd00000 0x4040>;
>> + interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 291 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>> + <&wcss_smp2p_in 0 0>,
>> + <&wcss_smp2p_in 1 0>,
>> + <&wcss_smp2p_in 2 0>,
>> + <&wcss_smp2p_in 3 0>;
>> + interrupt-names = "wdog",
>> + "fatal",
>> + "ready",
>> + "handover",
>> + "stop-ack";
>> +
>> + qcom,smem-states = <&wcss_smp2p_out 0>,
>> + <&wcss_smp2p_out 1>;
>> + qcom,smem-state-names = "shutdown",
>> + "stop";
>> + memory-region = <&q6_region>;
>> +
>> + glink-edge {
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 179 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> + label = "rtr";
>> + qcom,remote-pid = <1>;
>> + mboxes = <&apcs_glb 8>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + q6_wcss_pd1: remoteproc_pd1 {
>
> No underscores in node names, generic node names. Actually I don't get
> why do you need empty node at all.
>
I removed underscores, now name should be pd-1/pd-2/pd-3. Yeah, it
should not be empty node. I will correct it.
Thanks & Regards,
Manikanta.
>> + compatible = "qcom,ipq5018-wcss-ahb-mpd";
>> + };
>> +
>> + q6_wcss_pd2: remoteproc_pd2 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,ipq5018-wcss-pcie-mpd";
>> + interrupts-extended = <&wcss_smp2p_in 16 0>,
>> + <&wcss_smp2p_in 17 0>,
>> + <&wcss_smp2p_in 20 0>,
>> + <&wcss_smp2p_in 19 0>;
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists