[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <519e8811-ac40-4c24-9ff8-773c5a4e77fa@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 10:19:15 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mm tree
On Fri, May 19, 2023, at 04:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the mm tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/sparc/kernel/setup_64.c: In function 'start_early_boot':
> arch/sparc/kernel/setup_64.c:382:9: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'time_init_early'; did you mean 'inode_init_early'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 382 | time_init_early();
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | inode_init_early
>
> Presumably caused by commit
>
> c16caa9110dd ("init: consolidate prototypes in linux/init.h")
>
> I applied this partial revert:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 12:35:26 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "init: consolidate prototypes in linux/init.h"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Thanks! It looks like I accidentally dropped this one while looking
for stale 'init_time()' declarations.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists