linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 May 2023 10:19:15 +0200
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mm tree

On Fri, May 19, 2023, at 04:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the mm tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/sparc/kernel/setup_64.c: In function 'start_early_boot':
> arch/sparc/kernel/setup_64.c:382:9: error: implicit declaration of 
> function 'time_init_early'; did you mean 'inode_init_early'? 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   382 |         time_init_early();
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |         inode_init_early
>
> Presumably caused by commit
>
>   c16caa9110dd ("init: consolidate prototypes in linux/init.h")
>
> I applied this partial revert:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 12:35:26 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "init: consolidate prototypes in linux/init.h"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>

Thanks! It looks like I accidentally dropped this one while looking
for stale 'init_time()' declarations.

    Arnd