linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] dax: fix missing-prototype warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6466c272e944c_682c129459@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2023 17:27:30 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Gregory Price <gregory.price@...verge.com>,
        <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] dax: fix missing-prototype warnings

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> 
> dev_dax_probe declaration for this function was removed with the only
> caller outside of device.c. Mark it static to avoid a W=1
> warning:
> drivers/dax/device.c:399:5: error: no previous prototype for 'dev_dax_probe'
> 
> Similarly, run_dax() causes a warning, but this one is because the
> declaration needs to be included:
> 
> drivers/dax/super.c:337:6: error: no previous prototype for 'run_dax'
> 
> Fixes: 83762cb5c7c4 ("dax: Kill DEV_DAX_PMEM_COMPAT")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

> ---
>  drivers/dax/device.c | 3 +--
>  drivers/dax/super.c  | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/device.c b/drivers/dax/device.c
> index af9930c03c9c..30665a3ff6ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/device.c
> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static void dev_dax_kill(void *dev_dax)
>  	kill_dev_dax(dev_dax);
>  }
>  
> -int dev_dax_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
> +static int dev_dax_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
>  {
>  	struct dax_device *dax_dev = dev_dax->dax_dev;
>  	struct device *dev = &dev_dax->dev;
> @@ -471,7 +471,6 @@ int dev_dax_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
>  	run_dax(dax_dev);
>  	return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, dev_dax_kill, dev_dax);
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_dax_probe);
>  
>  static struct dax_device_driver device_dax_driver = {
>  	.probe = dev_dax_probe,

This hunk looks good.

> diff --git a/drivers/dax/super.c b/drivers/dax/super.c
> index c4c4728a36e4..8c05dae19bfe 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/super.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/super.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <linux/dax.h>
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include "dax-private.h"
> +#include "bus.h"

This one came up before, and IIRC last time I said lets just move the run_dax()
prototype to dax-private.h.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/YiqF1a9VNiSWI5j0@iweiny-desk3

I can fix that up when applying.