[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB52767257B1AC401121F3B24F8C7C9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 09:41:00 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
"lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 06/11] iommufd: IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC allocation with user
data
> From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 10:39 PM
> + if (cmd->hwpt_type != IOMMU_HWPT_TYPE_DEFAULT) {
> + if (!ops->domain_alloc_user_data_len) {
> + rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + goto out_put_idev;
> + }
> + klen = ops->domain_alloc_user_data_len(cmd->hwpt_type);
> + if (WARN_ON(klen < 0)) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_put_pt;
> + }
> + }
What about passing the user pointer to the iommu driver which
then does the copy so we don't need an extra @data_len()
callback for every driver?
>
> + switch (pt_obj->type) {
> + case IOMMUFD_OBJ_IOAS:
> + ioas = container_of(pt_obj, struct iommufd_ioas, obj);
> + break;
this should fail if parent is specified.
> + case IOMMUFD_OBJ_HW_PAGETABLE:
> + /* pt_id points HWPT only when hwpt_type
> is !IOMMU_HWPT_TYPE_DEFAULT */
> + if (cmd->hwpt_type == IOMMU_HWPT_TYPE_DEFAULT) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_put_pt;
> + }
> +
> + parent = container_of(pt_obj, struct iommufd_hw_pagetable,
> obj);
> + /*
> + * Cannot allocate user-managed hwpt linking to
> auto_created
> + * hwpt. If the parent hwpt is already a user-managed hwpt,
> + * don't allocate another user-managed hwpt linking to it.
> + */
> + if (parent->auto_domain || parent->parent) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_put_pt;
> + }
> + ioas = parent->ioas;
for nesting why is ioas required? In concept we can just pass NULL ioas
to iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc() for this hwpt. If within that function
there is a need to toggle ioas for the parent it can always retrieve it
from the parent hwpt.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists