lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2023 16:06:35 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        jforbes@...oraproject.org, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: next: arm64: build/gcc-12-lkftconfig-64k_page_size - error: call
 to '__compiletime_assert_494' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
 failed: (((16 - 3) * (4 - (2)) + 3)-16) > 10

On Wed, 17 May 2023 at 18:56, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Following arm64 builds failed on Linux next-20230517.
>
>  - build/gcc-12-lkftconfig-64k_page_size
>  - build/gcc-11-lkftconfig-64k_page_size
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> Build log:
> ======
> include/asm-generic/div64.h:46:27: warning: conversion from 'long
> unsigned int' to 'uint32_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} changes value from
> '4398046511104' to '0' [-Woverflow]
>    46 |         uint32_t __base = (base);                               \
>       |                           ^
> include/linux/math.h:40:44: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
>    40 |         ({ unsigned long long _tmp = (ll); do_div(_tmp, d); _tmp; })
>       |                                            ^~~~~~
> include/linux/math.h:43:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL'
>    43 |         DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL((unsigned long long)(ll) + (d) - 1, (d))
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c:95:22: note: in expansion of macro 'DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL'
>    95 |                 n += DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(range, PUD_SIZE);
>       |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from <command-line>:
> mm/huge_memory.c: In function 'hugepage_init':
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:397:45: error: call to
> '__compiletime_assert_494' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
> failed: (((16 - 3) * (4 - (2)) + 3)-16) > 10
>   397 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
> __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>       |                                             ^
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:378:25: note: in definition of macro
> '__compiletime_assert'
>   378 |                         prefix ## suffix();
>          \
>       |                         ^~~~~~
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:397:9: note: in expansion of macro
> '_compiletime_assert'
>   397 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
> __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro
> 'compiletime_assert'
>    39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
>       |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
>    50 |         BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/bug.h:24:25: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
>    24 |                         BUILD_BUG_ON(cond);             \
>       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> mm/huge_memory.c:470:9: note: in expansion of macro 'MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON'
>   470 |         MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON(HPAGE_PMD_ORDER > MAX_ORDER);
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:252: mm/huge_memory.o] Error 1

Linux next 20230517 arm64 64k page size build failed.

  - CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

Anders bisected and found the following is the first bad commit.

commit fd2d1cb8c5454888f67aba4c6218e30106862070
Author: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Date:   Wed May 3 13:33:42 2023 +0100

    arm64: Make the ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER config input prompt unconditional

    Commit 34affcd7577a ("arm64: drop ranges in definition of
    ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER") dropped the ranges from the config entry and
    introduced an EXPERT condition on the input prompt instead. This change
    may affect some distro kernels that change ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER but do
    not want to enable EXPERT.

    Drop EXPERT from the input prompt together with the (ARM64_4K_PAGES ||
    ARM64_16K_PAGES) condition as the latter no longer makes sense after the
    ranges were removed. The latter makes all the page size configurations
    consistent w.r.t. ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER.

    Fixes: 34affcd7577a ("arm64: drop ranges in definition of
ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER")
    Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
    Reported-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@...oraproject.org>
    Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
    Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
    Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
    Acked-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@...oraproject.org>
    Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@...nel.org>
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230503123342.90538-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com
    Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>

 arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)


--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org


>
>
> logs:
> =====
>  - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20230517/testrun/17031010/suite/build/test/gcc-12-lkftconfig-64k_page_size/log
>  - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20230517/testrun/17031010/suite/build/test/gcc-12-lkftconfig-64k_page_size/history/
>  - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20230517/testrun/17031010/suite/build/test/gcc-12-lkftconfig-64k_page_size/details/
>
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> ====
> # To install tuxmake on your system globally:
> # sudo pip3 install -U tuxmake
> #
> # See https://docs.tuxmake.org/ for complete documentation.
> # Original tuxmake command with fragments listed below.
> # tuxmake   \
>  --runtime podman   \
>  --target-arch arm64   \
>  --toolchain gcc-12   \
>  --kconfig defconfig   \
>  --kconfig-add https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/kirkstone/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/lkft.config
>   \
>  --kconfig-add https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/kirkstone/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/lkft-crypto.config
>   \
>  --kconfig-add https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/kirkstone/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/distro-overrides.config
>   \
>  --kconfig-add https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/kirkstone/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/systemd.config
>   \
>  --kconfig-add https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/kirkstone/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/virtio.config
>   \
>  --kconfig-add CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS=y   \
>  --kconfig-add CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES=y   \
>  --kconfig-add CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS=y   \
>  --kconfig-add CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y
>
> OR
>
> tuxmake   \
>  --runtime podman   \
>  --target-arch arm64   \
>  --toolchain gcc-12   \
>  --kconfig https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2PtylMMZpP2yGvgCnhE5SZngOYJ/config
>
>
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ