[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2305190334330.50034@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 12:24:17 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/PCI: Slightly simplify
pirq_convert_irt_table()
On Sat, 6 May 2023, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> 'size' if computed twice. *ir and *it being the same, the result is the
> same as well.
There is no `it' data object in this function; I presume you meant `rt'.
Then `*ir' and `*rt' are of a different type each, hence the calculations
are not the same. If they were the same, the function wouldn't be needed
at all in the first place. Therefore, NAK.
> While at it, also use struct_size() which is less verbose, more robust and
> more informative.
This might be a valuable clean-up, thank you, please submit separately.
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists