lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2023 14:09:45 +0200
From:   Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 15 (several RV64 build errors)


On 5/19/23 13:22, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:42:55PM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>
>>>> /opt/crosstool/gcc-12.2.0-nolibc/riscv64-linux/bin/riscv64-linux-ld:
>>>> section .data LMA [000000000041a000,00000000075bffd7] overlaps
>>>> section .text LMA [00000000000f09d4,00000000033562ab]
>>>> /opt/crosstool/gcc-12.2.0-nolibc/riscv64-linux/bin/riscv64-linux-ld:
>>>> section .init.pi.text LMA [00000000033562ac,0000000003359137]
>>>> overlaps section .data LMA [000000000041a000,00000000075bffd7]
>>>
>>> I'll check this one too which seems to be related to kernel/pi
>>> introduction.
>>
>> Thanks to Bjorn: this is caused by XIP_KERNEL, which is known to have
>> limited size, hence the overlap, so no fix for this one. Is there a way to
>> exclude this config from randconfig?
> What exactly is the problem? That the randconfig is too big for the max
> XIP kernel size?
> We already disable half the world for XIP, is turning off the pi stuff
> an option?


It's not related to the pi stuff, the problem has been present since 
5.13 (since the introduction of the XIP kernels :)).


>   It's already turned off for 32-bit, right?


Yes, it's only compiled with 64-bit kernels.


>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ