[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230519005231.3027912-5-rananta@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 00:52:29 +0000
From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: arm64: Flush only the memslot after write-protect
After write-protecting the region, currently KVM invalidates
the entire TLB entries using kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(). Instead,
scope the invalidation only to the targeted memslot. If
supported, the architecture would use the range-based TLBI
instructions to flush the memslot or else fallback to flushing
all of the TLBs.
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index e3673b4c10292..2ea6eb4ea763e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
stage2_wp_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, start, end);
write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, memslot);
}
/**
--
2.40.1.698.g37aff9b760-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists