[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGd22jBn1nkzzQsN@corigine.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 15:17:14 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Min-Hua Chen <minhuadotchen@...il.com>
Cc: alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, joabreu@...opsys.com, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: stmmac: compare p->des0 and p->des1 with __le32
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 07:46:52PM +0800, Min-Hua Chen wrote:
> [You don't often get email from minhuadotchen@...il.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> >On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 07:25:08PM +0800, Min-Hua Chen wrote:
> >> Use cpu_to_le32 to convert the constants to __le32 type
> >> before comparing them with p->des0 and p->des1 (they are __le32 type)
> >> and to fix following sparse warnings:
> >>
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_descs.c:110:23: sparse: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_descs.c:110:50: sparse: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Min-Hua Chen <minhuadotchen@...il.com>
> >
> >Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_descs.c | 3 ++-
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_descs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_descs.c
> >> index 13c347ee8be9..eefbeea04964 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_descs.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_descs.c
> >> @@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ static int dwxgmac2_rx_check_timestamp(void *desc)
> >> ts_valid = !(rdes3 & XGMAC_RDES3_TSD) && (rdes3 & XGMAC_RDES3_TSA);
> >>
> >> if (likely(desc_valid && ts_valid)) {
> >> - if ((p->des0 == 0xffffffff) && (p->des1 == 0xffffffff))
> >> + if ((p->des0 == cpu_to_le32(0xffffffff)) &&
> >> + (p->des1 == cpu_to_le32(0xffffffff)))
> >
> >nit: Sorry for not noticing this in v1.
> > There are unnecessary parentheses (both before and after this change).
> >
> Thanks, I noticed this before submitting v2 (by checkpath.pl) but I keep
> the original parentheses.
>
> I will do v3 with your Reviewed-by tag. :-)
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists