[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGd7fDmBDEmoiSE7@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 10:37:00 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] perf test attr: Update no event/metric
expectations
Em Thu, May 18, 2023 at 01:45:06PM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> On 2023-05-18 8:55 a.m., Liang, Kan wrote:
> > On 2023-05-18 8:20 a.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> Em Thu, May 18, 2023 at 08:50:14AM +0100, James Clark escreveu:
> >>>
> >>> On 17/05/2023 23:57, Ian Rogers wrote:
> >>>> Previously hard coded events/metrics were used, update for the use of
> >>>> the TopdownL1 json metric group.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: 94b1a603fca7 ("perf stat: Add TopdownL1 metric as a default if present")
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> tools/perf/tests/attr/base-stat | 2 +-
> >>>> tools/perf/tests/attr/test-stat-default | 80 ++++++++-----
> >>>> tools/perf/tests/attr/test-stat-detailed-1 | 95 +++++++++------
> >>>> tools/perf/tests/attr/test-stat-detailed-2 | 119 +++++++++++--------
> >>>> tools/perf/tests/attr/test-stat-detailed-3 | 127 ++++++++++++---------
> >>>> 5 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 174 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
> >> Thanks, applied both patches to perf-tools.
> >>
> > Could you please hold patch 1 for a while?
>
> Sorry for the noise.
>
> Ian has addressed my concerns. The patch looks good to me now.
> It also fixes a "Failed" on my Cascade Lake machine.
>
> Tested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks, added it,
- Arnaldo
> But for long term, we probably need a better solution to avoid keeping
> adding such non-architectural events in the test case.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists