| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230519101840.v5.13.I847d9ec852449350997ba00401d2462a9cb4302b@changeid>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 10:18:37 -0700
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...omium.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
npiggin@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@...iatek.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, ito-yuichi@...itsu.com,
ricardo.neri@...el.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 13/18] watchdog/hardlockup: Have the perf hardlockup use __weak functions more cleanly
The fact that there watchdog_hardlockup_enable(),
watchdog_hardlockup_disable(), and watchdog_hardlockup_probe() are
declared __weak means that the configured hardlockup detector can
define non-weak versions of those functions if it needs to. Instead of
doing this, the perf hardlockup detector hooked itself into the
default __weak implementation, which was a bit awkward. Clean this up.
>From comments, it looks as if the original design was done because the
__weak function were expected to implemented by the architecture and
not by the configured hardlockup detector. This got awkward when we
tried to add the buddy lockup detector which was not arch-specific but
wanted to hook into those same functions.
This is not expected to have any functional impact.
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---
(no changes since v4)
Changes in v4:
- ("Have the perf hardlockup use __weak ...") new for v4.
include/linux/nmi.h | 10 ----------
kernel/watchdog.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
kernel/watchdog_perf.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/nmi.h b/include/linux/nmi.h
index 83076bf70ce8..c216e8a1be1f 100644
--- a/include/linux/nmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/nmi.h
@@ -103,21 +103,11 @@ static inline void arch_touch_nmi_watchdog(void) { }
#if defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF)
extern void hardlockup_detector_perf_stop(void);
extern void hardlockup_detector_perf_restart(void);
-extern void hardlockup_detector_perf_disable(void);
-extern void hardlockup_detector_perf_enable(void);
extern void hardlockup_detector_perf_cleanup(void);
-extern int hardlockup_detector_perf_init(void);
#else
static inline void hardlockup_detector_perf_stop(void) { }
static inline void hardlockup_detector_perf_restart(void) { }
-static inline void hardlockup_detector_perf_disable(void) { }
-static inline void hardlockup_detector_perf_enable(void) { }
static inline void hardlockup_detector_perf_cleanup(void) { }
-# if !defined(CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG)
-static inline int hardlockup_detector_perf_init(void) { return -ENODEV; }
-# else
-static inline int hardlockup_detector_perf_init(void) { return 0; }
-# endif
#endif
void watchdog_hardlockup_stop(void);
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 31548c0ae874..08ce046f636d 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -187,27 +187,33 @@ static inline void watchdog_hardlockup_kick(void) { }
#endif /* !CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF */
/*
- * These functions can be overridden if an architecture implements its
- * own hardlockup detector.
+ * These functions can be overridden based on the configured hardlockdup detector.
*
* watchdog_hardlockup_enable/disable can be implemented to start and stop when
- * softlockup watchdog start and stop. The arch must select the
+ * softlockup watchdog start and stop. The detector must select the
* SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR Kconfig.
*/
-void __weak watchdog_hardlockup_enable(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- hardlockup_detector_perf_enable();
-}
+void __weak watchdog_hardlockup_enable(unsigned int cpu) { }
-void __weak watchdog_hardlockup_disable(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- hardlockup_detector_perf_disable();
-}
+void __weak watchdog_hardlockup_disable(unsigned int cpu) { }
/* Return 0, if a hardlockup watchdog is available. Error code otherwise */
int __weak __init watchdog_hardlockup_probe(void)
{
- return hardlockup_detector_perf_init();
+ /*
+ * If CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG is defined then an architecture
+ * is assumed to have the hard watchdog available and we return 0.
+ */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG))
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Hardlockup detectors other than those using CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG
+ * are required to implement a non-weak version of this probe function
+ * to tell whether they are available. If they don't override then
+ * we'll return -ENODEV.
+ */
+ return -ENODEV;
}
/**
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c b/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
index 9e6042a892b3..349fcd4d2abc 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
@@ -132,10 +132,14 @@ static int hardlockup_detector_event_create(void)
}
/**
- * hardlockup_detector_perf_enable - Enable the local event
+ * watchdog_hardlockup_enable - Enable the local event
+ *
+ * @cpu: The CPU to enable hard lockup on.
*/
-void hardlockup_detector_perf_enable(void)
+void watchdog_hardlockup_enable(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != smp_processor_id());
+
if (hardlockup_detector_event_create())
return;
@@ -147,12 +151,16 @@ void hardlockup_detector_perf_enable(void)
}
/**
- * hardlockup_detector_perf_disable - Disable the local event
+ * watchdog_hardlockup_disable - Disable the local event
+ *
+ * @cpu: The CPU to enable hard lockup on.
*/
-void hardlockup_detector_perf_disable(void)
+void watchdog_hardlockup_disable(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct perf_event *event = this_cpu_read(watchdog_ev);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu != smp_processor_id());
+
if (event) {
perf_event_disable(event);
this_cpu_write(watchdog_ev, NULL);
@@ -227,9 +235,9 @@ void __init hardlockup_detector_perf_restart(void)
}
/**
- * hardlockup_detector_perf_init - Probe whether NMI event is available at all
+ * watchdog_hardlockup_probe - Probe whether NMI event is available at all
*/
-int __init hardlockup_detector_perf_init(void)
+int __init watchdog_hardlockup_probe(void)
{
int ret = hardlockup_detector_event_create();
--
2.40.1.698.g37aff9b760-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists