linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests/nolibc: Fix up compile error for rv32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <958f09b4-8cd7-46b3-aa54-4d981fd8f1bc@t-8ch.de>
Date:   Sat, 20 May 2023 16:00:54 +0200
From:   Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
To:     Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
Cc:     aou@...s.berkeley.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, shuah@...nel.org,
        w@....eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/nolibc: Fix up compile error for rv32

Hi Willy, Zhangjin,

On 2023-05-20 20:02:53+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> When compile nolibc-test.c for rv32, we got such error:
> 
>     tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c:599:57: error: ‘__NR_fstat’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>       599 |   CASE_TEST(syscall_args);      EXPECT_SYSER(1, syscall(__NR_fstat, 0, NULL), -1, EFAULT); break;
> 
> The generic include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h used by rv32 doesn't
> support __NR_fstat, using the common __NR_read functions as expected.
> 
>     Running test 'syscall'
>     69 syscall_noargs = 1                                            [OK]
>     70 syscall_args = -1 EBADF                                       [OK]
> 
> Btw, the latest riscv libc6-dev package is required, otherwise, we would
> also get such error:
> 
>     In file included from /usr/riscv64-linux-gnu/include/sys/cdefs.h:452,
>                      from /usr/riscv64-linux-gnu/include/features.h:461,
>                      from /usr/riscv64-linux-gnu/include/bits/libc-header-start.h:33,
>                      from /usr/riscv64-linux-gnu/include/limits.h:26,
>                      from /usr/lib/gcc-cross/riscv64-linux-gnu/9/include/limits.h:194,
>                      from /usr/lib/gcc-cross/riscv64-linux-gnu/9/include/syslimits.h:7,
>                      from /usr/lib/gcc-cross/riscv64-linux-gnu/9/include/limits.h:34,
>                      from /labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c:6:
>     /usr/riscv64-linux-gnu/include/bits/wordsize.h:28:3: error: #error "rv32i-based targets are not supported"
>        28 | # error "rv32i-based targets are not supported"
> 
> The glibc commit 5b6113d62efa ("RISC-V: Support the 32-bit ABI
> implementation") fixed up above error, so, glibc >= 2.33 (who includes
> this commit) is required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> index 063f9959ac44..d8b59c8f6c03 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ int run_syscall(int min, int max)
>  		CASE_TEST(write_badf);        EXPECT_SYSER(1, write(-1, &tmp, 1), -1, EBADF); break;
>  		CASE_TEST(write_zero);        EXPECT_SYSZR(1, write(1, &tmp, 0)); break;
>  		CASE_TEST(syscall_noargs);    EXPECT_SYSEQ(1, syscall(__NR_getpid), getpid()); break;
> -		CASE_TEST(syscall_args);      EXPECT_SYSER(1, syscall(__NR_fstat, 0, NULL), -1, EFAULT); break;
> +		CASE_TEST(syscall_args);      EXPECT_SYSER(1, syscall(__NR_read, -1, &tmp, 1), -1, EBADF); break;

The goal of this second test was to make sure that arguments are passed
in the correct order. For this I tried to have a syscall were the
checked error is generated from a non-first argument.
(The NULL generating the EFAULT).

So the new check does not fullfil this goal anymore.

Maybe we can find a new syscall to test with?

The code should have had a comment I guess.

>  		case __LINE__:
>  			return ret; /* must be last */
>  		/* note: do not set any defaults so as to permit holes above */
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>