lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR21MB16884CCC195B1D90BFB30D0CD77DA@BYAPR21MB1688.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Sat, 20 May 2023 16:50:13 +0000
From:   "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
To:     Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        "wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: hv: Kconfig: Add HYPERV_VTL_MODE
 dependencies

From: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
> 
> MTRRs are not per-VTL and are controlled by VTL0, make sure it
> is disabled for all other VTLs.

Clarifying the wording a bit:

MTRRs are not per-VTL, but are always controlled by VTL0.   Allow
building for VTLs other than VTL0 only when MTRR functionality
is disabled.

> 
> X86_MPPARSE scans low memory for MP tables, which is not required
> for Hyper-V VTL platforms.

Is the above statement saying that MP tables aren't required, so remove
the code to save space?  Or is there a problem/failure if MP table code
runs and scans low memory?   *Requiring* that it be disabled, and the
reference to scanning low memory makes me think it might be the latter,
in which case I'd suggest this more forceful wording:

The MP table code scans low memory, which causes failures in VTLs
other than VTL0.   Allow building for VTLs other than VTL0 only when
MP table functionality is disabled.

If you can give slightly more detail about "causes failures" (a panic?
some other problem?) that would be good too.

Michael

> 
> Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hv/Kconfig | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/Kconfig b/drivers/hv/Kconfig
> index 00242107d62e..c8d443886b9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hv/Kconfig
> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ config HYPERV
>  config HYPERV_VTL_MODE
>  	bool "Enable Linux to boot in VTL context"
>  	depends on X86_64 && HYPERV
> +	depends on !MTRR
> +	depends on !X86_MPPARSE
>  	default n
>  	help
>  	  Virtual Secure Mode (VSM) is a set of hypervisor capabilities and
> --
> 2.34.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ