linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 03/11] ARM: 9295/1: unwind:fix unwind abort for uleb128 case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230520182215.845131-3-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 20 May 2023 14:22:06 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Haibo Li <haibo.li@...iatek.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 03/11] ARM: 9295/1: unwind:fix unwind abort for uleb128 case

From: Haibo Li <haibo.li@...iatek.com>

[ Upstream commit fa3eeb638de0c1a9d2d860e5b48259facdd65176 ]

When unwind instruction is 0xb2,the subsequent instructions
are uleb128 bytes.
For now,it uses only the first uleb128 byte in code.

For vsp increments of 0x204~0x400,use one uleb128 byte like below:
0xc06a00e4 <unwind_test_work>: 0x80b27fac
  Compact model index: 0
  0xb2 0x7f vsp = vsp + 1024
  0xac      pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r14}

For vsp increments larger than 0x400,use two uleb128 bytes like below:
0xc06a00e4 <unwind_test_work>: @0xc0cc9e0c
  Compact model index: 1
  0xb2 0x81 0x01 vsp = vsp + 1032
  0xac      pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r14}
The unwind works well since the decoded uleb128 byte is also 0x81.

For vsp increments larger than 0x600,use two uleb128 bytes like below:
0xc06a00e4 <unwind_test_work>: @0xc0cc9e0c
  Compact model index: 1
  0xb2 0x81 0x02 vsp = vsp + 1544
  0xac      pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r14}
In this case,the decoded uleb128 result is 0x101(vsp=0x204+(0x101<<2)).
While the uleb128 used in code is 0x81(vsp=0x204+(0x81<<2)).
The unwind aborts at this frame since it gets incorrect vsp.

To fix this,add uleb128 decode to cover all the above case.

Signed-off-by: Haibo Li <haibo.li@...iatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
index 59fdf257bf8be..d91ed8e4310c2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
@@ -301,6 +301,29 @@ static int unwind_exec_pop_subset_r0_to_r3(struct unwind_ctrl_block *ctrl,
 	return URC_OK;
 }
 
+static unsigned long unwind_decode_uleb128(struct unwind_ctrl_block *ctrl)
+{
+	unsigned long bytes = 0;
+	unsigned long insn;
+	unsigned long result = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * unwind_get_byte() will advance `ctrl` one instruction at a time, so
+	 * loop until we get an instruction byte where bit 7 is not set.
+	 *
+	 * Note: This decodes a maximum of 4 bytes to output 28 bits data where
+	 * max is 0xfffffff: that will cover a vsp increment of 1073742336, hence
+	 * it is sufficient for unwinding the stack.
+	 */
+	do {
+		insn = unwind_get_byte(ctrl);
+		result |= (insn & 0x7f) << (bytes * 7);
+		bytes++;
+	} while (!!(insn & 0x80) && (bytes != sizeof(result)));
+
+	return result;
+}
+
 /*
  * Execute the current unwind instruction.
  */
@@ -354,7 +377,7 @@ static int unwind_exec_insn(struct unwind_ctrl_block *ctrl)
 		if (ret)
 			goto error;
 	} else if (insn == 0xb2) {
-		unsigned long uleb128 = unwind_get_byte(ctrl);
+		unsigned long uleb128 = unwind_decode_uleb128(ctrl);
 
 		ctrl->vrs[SP] += 0x204 + (uleb128 << 2);
 	} else {
-- 
2.39.2