Message-ID: <876eb6b4-db0f-02e8-9b24-4db3ebc6962d@molgen.mpg.de>
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2023 16:03:47 +0200
From:   Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To:     Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc:     song@...nel.org, neilb@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yukuai3@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] md: fix duplicate filename for rdev

Dear Yu,


Thank you for your patch. Just a few nits, that can be ignored.

Am 22.05.23 um 15:32 schrieb Yu Kuai:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> 
> commit 5792a2856a63 ("[PATCH] md: avoid a deadlock when removing a device

I’d start with capital letter: Commit ….

> from an md array via sysfs") delay the deleting of rdev, however, this

1.  delay*s*
2.  s/deleting/deletion/

> introduce a window that rdev can be added again while the deleting is

1.  introduce*s*
2.  s/deleting/deletion/

> not done yet, and sysfs will complain about duplicate filename.
> 
> Follow up patches try to fix this problem by flush workqueue, however,

flush*ing* the work queue

> flush_rdev_wq() is just dead code, the progress in
> md_kick_rdev_from_array():

… is:

> 1) list_del_rcu(&rdev->same_set);
> 2) synchronize_rcu();
> 3) queue_work(md_rdev_misc_wq, &rdev->del_work);
> 
> So in flush_rdev_wq(), if rdev is found in the list, work_pending() can
> never pass, in the meantime, if work is queued, then rdev can never be
> found in the list.
> 
> flush_rdev_wq() can be replaced by flush_workqueue() directly, however,
> this approach is not good:
> - the workqueue is global, this synchronization for all raid disks is
>    not necessary.

The work queue …

> - flush_workqueue can't be called under 'reconfig_mutex', there is still
>    a small window between flush_workqueue() and mddev_lock() that other
>    context can queue new work, hence the problem is not solved completely.

context*s*

> sysfs already have apis to support delete itself through writer, and

1.  s/have/has/
2.  deleting

> these apis, specifically sysfs_break/unbreak_active_protection(), is used

s/is/are/

> to support deleting rdev synchronously. Therefore, the above commit can be
> reverted, and sysfs duplicate filename can be avoided.
> 
> A new mdadm regression test is proposed as well.

It’s not included, right? Then I’d remove the sentence, or write: … is 
going to be proposed …


Kind regards,

Paul


> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-raid/20230428062845.1975462-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com/
> Fixes: 5792a2856a63 ("[PATCH] md: avoid a deadlock when removing a device from an md array via sysfs")
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>   - rebase from the latest md-next branch
> 
>   drivers/md/md.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>   drivers/md/md.h |  8 +++++
>   2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 7455bc9d8498..cafb457d614c 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *md_rdev_misc_wq;
>   static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
>   				 struct md_rdev *this);
>   static void mddev_detach(struct mddev *mddev);
> +static void export_rdev(struct md_rdev *rdev);
>   
>   /*
>    * Default number of read corrections we'll attempt on an rdev
> @@ -643,9 +644,11 @@ void mddev_init(struct mddev *mddev)
>   {
>   	mutex_init(&mddev->open_mutex);
>   	mutex_init(&mddev->reconfig_mutex);
> +	mutex_init(&mddev->delete_mutex);
>   	mutex_init(&mddev->bitmap_info.mutex);
>   	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mddev->disks);
>   	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mddev->all_mddevs);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mddev->deleting);
>   	timer_setup(&mddev->safemode_timer, md_safemode_timeout, 0);
>   	atomic_set(&mddev->active, 1);
>   	atomic_set(&mddev->openers, 0);
> @@ -747,6 +750,23 @@ static void mddev_free(struct mddev *mddev)
>   
>   static const struct attribute_group md_redundancy_group;
>   
> +static void md_free_rdev(struct mddev *mddev)
> +{
> +	struct md_rdev *rdev;
> +	struct md_rdev *tmp;
> +
> +	if (list_empty_careful(&mddev->deleting))
> +		return;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&mddev->delete_mutex);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(rdev, tmp, &mddev->deleting, same_set) {
> +		list_del_init(&rdev->same_set);
> +		kobject_del(&rdev->kobj);
> +		export_rdev(rdev);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&mddev->delete_mutex);
> +}
> +
>   void mddev_unlock(struct mddev *mddev)
>   {
>   	if (mddev->to_remove) {
> @@ -788,6 +808,8 @@ void mddev_unlock(struct mddev *mddev)
>   	} else
>   		mutex_unlock(&mddev->reconfig_mutex);
>   
> +	md_free_rdev(mddev);
> +
>   	/* As we've dropped the mutex we need a spinlock to
>   	 * make sure the thread doesn't disappear
>   	 */
> @@ -2428,13 +2450,6 @@ static int bind_rdev_to_array(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct mddev *mddev)
>   	return err;
>   }
>   
> -static void rdev_delayed_delete(struct work_struct *ws)
> -{
> -	struct md_rdev *rdev = container_of(ws, struct md_rdev, del_work);
> -	kobject_del(&rdev->kobj);
> -	kobject_put(&rdev->kobj);
> -}
> -
>   void md_autodetect_dev(dev_t dev);
>   
>   static void export_rdev(struct md_rdev *rdev)
> @@ -2452,6 +2467,8 @@ static void export_rdev(struct md_rdev *rdev)
>   
>   static void md_kick_rdev_from_array(struct md_rdev *rdev)
>   {
> +	struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev;
> +
>   	bd_unlink_disk_holder(rdev->bdev, rdev->mddev->gendisk);
>   	list_del_rcu(&rdev->same_set);
>   	pr_debug("md: unbind<%pg>\n", rdev->bdev);
> @@ -2465,15 +2482,17 @@ static void md_kick_rdev_from_array(struct md_rdev *rdev)
>   	rdev->sysfs_unack_badblocks = NULL;
>   	rdev->sysfs_badblocks = NULL;
>   	rdev->badblocks.count = 0;
> -	/* We need to delay this, otherwise we can deadlock when
> -	 * writing to 'remove' to "dev/state".  We also need
> -	 * to delay it due to rcu usage.
> -	 */
> +
>   	synchronize_rcu();
> -	INIT_WORK(&rdev->del_work, rdev_delayed_delete);
> -	kobject_get(&rdev->kobj);
> -	queue_work(md_rdev_misc_wq, &rdev->del_work);
> -	export_rdev(rdev);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * kobject_del() will wait for all in progress writers to be done, where
> +	 * reconfig_mutex is held, hence it can't be called under
> +	 * reconfig_mutex and it's delayed to mddev_unlock().
> +	 */
> +	mutex_lock(&mddev->delete_mutex);
> +	list_add(&rdev->same_set, &mddev->deleting);
> +	mutex_unlock(&mddev->delete_mutex);
>   }
>   
>   static void export_array(struct mddev *mddev)
> @@ -3541,6 +3560,7 @@ rdev_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
>   {
>   	struct rdev_sysfs_entry *entry = container_of(attr, struct rdev_sysfs_entry, attr);
>   	struct md_rdev *rdev = container_of(kobj, struct md_rdev, kobj);
> +	struct kernfs_node *kn = NULL;
>   	ssize_t rv;
>   	struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev;
>   
> @@ -3548,6 +3568,10 @@ rdev_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
>   		return -EIO;
>   	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>   		return -EACCES;
> +
> +	if (entry->store == state_store && cmd_match(page, "remove"))
> +		kn = sysfs_break_active_protection(kobj, attr);
> +
>   	rv = mddev ? mddev_lock(mddev) : -ENODEV;
>   	if (!rv) {
>   		if (rdev->mddev == NULL)
> @@ -3556,6 +3580,10 @@ rdev_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
>   			rv = entry->store(rdev, page, length);
>   		mddev_unlock(mddev);
>   	}
> +
> +	if (kn)
> +		sysfs_unbreak_active_protection(kn);
> +
>   	return rv;
>   }
>   
> @@ -4479,20 +4507,6 @@ null_show(struct mddev *mddev, char *page)
>   	return -EINVAL;
>   }
>   
> -/* need to ensure rdev_delayed_delete() has completed */
> -static void flush_rdev_wq(struct mddev *mddev)
> -{
> -	struct md_rdev *rdev;
> -
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -	rdev_for_each_rcu(rdev, mddev)
> -		if (work_pending(&rdev->del_work)) {
> -			flush_workqueue(md_rdev_misc_wq);
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -}
> -
>   static ssize_t
>   new_dev_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
>   {
> @@ -4520,7 +4534,6 @@ new_dev_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
>   	    minor != MINOR(dev))
>   		return -EOVERFLOW;
>   
> -	flush_rdev_wq(mddev);
>   	err = mddev_lock(mddev);
>   	if (err)
>   		return err;
> @@ -5590,7 +5603,6 @@ struct mddev *md_alloc(dev_t dev, char *name)
>   	 * removed (mddev_delayed_delete).
>   	 */
>   	flush_workqueue(md_misc_wq);
> -	flush_workqueue(md_rdev_misc_wq);
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&disks_mutex);
>   	mddev = mddev_alloc(dev);
> @@ -7553,9 +7565,6 @@ static int md_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>   
>   	}
>   
> -	if (cmd == ADD_NEW_DISK || cmd == HOT_ADD_DISK)
> -		flush_rdev_wq(mddev);
> -
>   	if (cmd == HOT_REMOVE_DISK)
>   		/* need to ensure recovery thread has run */
>   		wait_event_interruptible_timeout(mddev->sb_wait,
> @@ -9618,10 +9627,6 @@ static int __init md_init(void)
>   	if (!md_misc_wq)
>   		goto err_misc_wq;
>   
> -	md_rdev_misc_wq = alloc_workqueue("md_rdev_misc", 0, 0);
> -	if (!md_rdev_misc_wq)
> -		goto err_rdev_misc_wq;
> -
>   	ret = __register_blkdev(MD_MAJOR, "md", md_probe);
>   	if (ret < 0)
>   		goto err_md;
> @@ -9640,8 +9645,6 @@ static int __init md_init(void)
>   err_mdp:
>   	unregister_blkdev(MD_MAJOR, "md");
>   err_md:
> -	destroy_workqueue(md_rdev_misc_wq);
> -err_rdev_misc_wq:
>   	destroy_workqueue(md_misc_wq);
>   err_misc_wq:
>   	destroy_workqueue(md_wq);
> @@ -9937,7 +9940,6 @@ static __exit void md_exit(void)
>   	}
>   	spin_unlock(&all_mddevs_lock);
>   
> -	destroy_workqueue(md_rdev_misc_wq);
>   	destroy_workqueue(md_misc_wq);
>   	destroy_workqueue(md_wq);
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
> index 1eec65cf783c..4d191db831da 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.h
> @@ -531,6 +531,14 @@ struct mddev {
>   	unsigned int			good_device_nr;	/* good device num within cluster raid */
>   	unsigned int			noio_flag; /* for memalloc scope API */
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Temporarily store rdev that will be finally removed when
> +	 * reconfig_mutex is unlocked.
> +	 */
> +	struct list_head		deleting;
> +	/* Protect the deleting list */
> +	struct mutex			delete_mutex;
> +
>   	bool	has_superblocks:1;
>   	bool	fail_last_dev:1;
>   	bool	serialize_policy:1;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists