[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a5f9bc-f230-243b-e77c-9ae849008fb5@arinc9.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 17:35:13 +0300
From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Richard van Schagen <richard@...terhints.com>,
Richard van Schagen <vschagen@...com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@...stell8.be>,
erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, mithat.guner@...ont.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/30] net: dsa: mt7530: improve, trap BPDU &
LLDP, and prefer CPU port
On 22/05/2023 17:09, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The 05/22/2023 15:15, arinc9.unal@...il.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> This patch series simplifies the code, improves the logic of the switch
>> hardware support, traps LLDP frames and BPDUs for MT7530, MT7531, and
>> MT7988 SoC switches, and introduces the preferring local CPU port
>> operation.
>>
>> There's also a patch for fixing the port capabilities of the switch on the
>> MT7988 SoC.
>>
>
> I have noticed that in many patches of the series you have:
> Tested-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
>
> Where you also have:
> Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
>
> I think you can drop Tested-by as the SoB will imply that. I think you
> got a similar comment some time ago to a different patch series.
Yes, that was for the net, therefore the stable tree. The very first
rule for the patches going to the stable tree is that the patch must be
tested.
I don't see a clear indication of the patches submitted to net-next
being tested on the relevant hardware by the author. Therefore, I
explicitly put my tag to state it. Let me know if you don't agree with this.
Arınç
Powered by blists - more mailing lists